FEATURED CONTENT: New Directions 2019 | Disrupting Peer Review
- New Directions in Scholarly Publishing Models: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
- Heather Staines, Jessica Polka, Damian Pattinson, David Mellor
Click the play button above to view the video and a complete transcript of the session. Complete videos, segments or clips can be viewed and shared via social media.
Peer review continues to be an essential part of the formal publication process; however, scholarly research is in a constant state of development. In the last few years, there has been a wave of innovation in peer review research, platforms, discussions, tools, and services, coupled with the ongoing and parallel evolution of scholarly communication as it potentially adjusts to various “open science” initiatives. Check out this interactive session as we explore badging as transparency indicators, the impact of peer-reviewing preprints, and utilizing communities to separate process from the publication workflow.
Heather Staines, Head of Partnerships, MIT Knowledge Futures Project
Jessica Polka, Executive Director, ASAPbio
Damian Pattinson, VP of Publishing Innovation, Research Square
David Mellor, Director of Policy Initiatives, Center for Open Science